Senior politicians acknowledge that the White House is beset by enemies: China, and America is “bleeding” or divided

2022-04-30 0 By

On February 15th A veteran American politician, Joseph Buchanan, who has advised three American presidents, told a press conference that Washington’s strategy of making enemies everywhere was driving the country apart.Buchanan, who advised former US presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, said Washington could not withstand another geopolitical “extreme intensity test”, Russian media reported.Buchanan said the abrupt end of the Cold War had left Americans “with everything at once, an irreplaceable superpower.”However, the United States is constantly involved in wars to build the so-called “new international order”, which makes the United States “bleed”.Trump’s anachronistic strategic competition with China has led the US into a path of distraction, self-consumption and division.The veteran politician believes that the US has chosen the wrong opponent at the wrong time, at least in terms of timing, and should not turn against China in 2018.In the first two decades of the 21st century, 9/11 created a brief consensus on terrorism.Although the “enemy” that generated and sustained the consensus on terrorism was vague and fragile, it profoundly changed modern America, initiating a state of emergency in the American government that persists to this day, and renewing the hope that the United States could alleviate its internal difficulties through foreign wars of aggression.The anti-terrorism consensus at home is fleeting, the war on terror abroad is deeply in debt, income inequality has aggravated the division of class, the political line of racialization of class issue has been continued, and the great division of American society has become a consensus.In the 2020 election, voter turnout was the highest ever, and support for both candidates was even.Despite the severe economic downturn and soaring unemployment caused by COVID-19, Trump still received 74 million votes, more than any other unsuccessful presidential candidate in history, which fully demonstrates his solid public opinion base.Although Biden won the election, the poll found that 68 percent of voters who supported Him were against Trump and only 46 percent were for Biden.Eighty-six percent of Trump supporters oppose the Black Lives Matter movement, 84 percent believe that race is a minor issue in the United States and that the criminal justice system is fair.Seventy-eight percent of Biden supporters support the Black Lives Matter movement, and 82 percent think the U.S. criminal justice system is clearly unfair to blacks.Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, declared that the election reflected that America was now “one America, two States”.After the end of the Cold War, the American elites made a lot of misjudgments. First of all, they believed that they could achieve any strategic goal with the help of the legacy of the Cold War. They wrongly conducted wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and finally spent trillions of dollars for nothing.The loss of a large number of American assets led to the widening of the gap between the rich and the poor in the United States, which eventually evolved into the division and confrontation between the whole social class.As a hegemonic power, the United States traditionally tends to view China’s rise from the perspective of geopolitics and national security, and regards China’s rise as a geopolitical and security challenge. The primary consideration of its China policy is to contain China’s development and maintain its global hegemony.At present, there are two new features in the US threat perception of China.The first is primacy, which refers to China as the “primary threat” to the United States.The Biden administration’s interim Guidance on National Security Strategy and the 2021 Threat Assessment by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence both listed China as a “primary challenge.”Second, comprehensiveness.In the view of the United States, the competition with China is comprehensive, involving economic and trade relations, ideology, geopolitics and international mechanisms.For the EU, China is neither a “primary threat” nor an “all-out competitor”.The EU still sees China as a “cooperative partner”, a “negotiating partner”, an “economic competitor” and an “institutional rival”.Under the influence of the United States, the EU began to pay more and more attention to the security and competitive factors of China-Eu relations. However, in its perception of China, geopolitics and security are not the primary concerns, while economic interests are still the main influencing factors.In addition, due to the eu’s multilateralism and commitment to multilateralism, the EU’s perception of China is deeply influenced by the perspective of multilateralism, that is, China is regarded as an important force in the multilateral international system and coping with global challenges.Under the influence of the concept of strategic autonomy, the European and American policy coordination towards China is also different from the “US-led and EUROPE-subordinate” model in the past transatlantic relations.On China policy and the broader transatlantic policy agenda, the EU is no longer a “junior partner” that lets the US set the agenda, but one of the more equal agenda-setters.The EU will shape its own China policy agenda based on its own interests and values, and have a greater say in transatlantic policy coordination with China.Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel said NATO should not ignore China, but also should not exaggerate its threat.China remains a partner on many issues, so Merkel advocates NATO’s dual-track approach of deterrence and dialogue on China.As can be seen from the china-related statements of European leaders, While strengthening cooperation with the US on Its China policy, Europe also keeps a certain distance from the US ‘” new Cold War “style China policy and retains space for strategic independence.Can Biden save America?At present, the two parties in the United States are becoming increasingly polarized, and their differences are difficult to bridge.Fukuyama believes that the current “veto politics” has begun to dominate the political operation of the United States, and the political model of “veto up, governance down, constant partisanship and low efficiency” has made the polarization of the two parties reach its peak.Mr Biden is clearly facing the same test as Mr Trump, who began his presidency in the same way that republicans almost reversed Mr Obama’s policies.Delivering on campaign promises will also be a test for the Biden administration.Black Americans, especially the black movement, helped Biden win.In May 2020, Biden endorsed the Black Lives Matter movement, promising justice reform, financial aid and housing reform for black businesses and communities.Biden drew strong support from this segment of black voters and reaped handsome returns in the general election.Immediately after biden’s victory, groups demanded immediate action on his promises, including health care, housing, education and police reform.This puts Biden in a dilemma: If he pandered to African-American voters, he would undermine groups like the police and increase the rivalry between law enforcement and the public.If they do not fulfill their campaign promises, they will greatly hurt the feelings of African American voters and damage their ruling base and political interests.Clearly, Mr Biden is not the man to save America from disaster.